Q01
Can I extract links from a README before publishing?
Yes. Paste the Markdown and review anchor text with target URLs before you run a broken-link check.
Extract Markdown links, anchors, and destinations for SEO/content audits
Quick CTA
Paste Markdown first to extract links, labels, and URLs immediately; reference-style notes stay in Deep.
Next step workflow
Deep expands pitfalls, recipes, snippets, FAQ, and related tools when you need troubleshooting or deeper follow-through.
Extract links from Markdown files without reading the whole document by hand. Paste a README, docs page, release note, or blog draft to pull out anchor text and target URLs, then copy a clean list for broken-link checks, redirect mapping, or internal-link review. Everything runs client-side, so private drafts and internal docs stay in your browser.
Q01
Yes. Paste the Markdown and review anchor text with target URLs before you run a broken-link check.
Q02
Markdown links carry anchor text. Keeping the label beside the URL makes SEO and docs review much faster.
Markdown link extraction
Use it when anchor text, docs QA, or SEO review matters.
Generic URL extraction
Use it when you only need every URL-like string from arbitrary text.
Note: For Markdown content, the anchor text is usually part of the quality signal.
Inline only
Use for quick checks on short notes.
Inline + reference
Use for docs repos with reference-style links.
Note: Reference links are common in large docs and often missed by simple extractors.
Regex
Use for fast ad-hoc scans where precision is secondary.
AST parsing
Use for CI lint and link integrity automation.
Note: AST parsing handles nested syntax and edge cases far more reliably.
Structured extraction
Use for long docs and release bundles with many link forms.
Manual scanning
Use only for tiny notes where overhead is unnecessary.
Note: Extraction prevents missing links hidden in reference syntax.
URL-only
Use it for a quick broken-link pass.
Anchor + URL
Use it when docs quality, SEO anchors, or migration mapping matter.
Note: A reachable URL can still be the wrong destination or carry weak anchor text.
README draft
Use extraction as a quick editorial check before publishing.
Migration batch
Use extraction as the first pass before redirect and canonical checks.
Note: The same link list can serve writers, SEOs, and migration reviewers if it keeps anchor text attached.
Recommend: Extract anchor text and URL together before running the broken-link pass.
Avoid: Avoid checking URLs alone when anchor text and canonical destination quality matter.
Recommend: Use AST parsing with reference resolution and normalized dedup.
Avoid: Avoid regex-only checks for production gating.
Recommend: Regex extraction is acceptable for rough triage.
Avoid: Avoid treating quick triage output as final audit result.
Recommend: Extract links first, then run batched validation by domain type.
Avoid: Avoid relying only on ad-hoc reviewer eyeballing.
Recommend: Review anchor text first, then run broken-link checks.
Avoid: Avoid relying only on whether extracted URLs return 200.
Recommend: Group extracted links by old/new path families before fixing.
Avoid: Avoid mixing external references and internal redirects in one undifferentiated list.
Bad input: Link like `(https://example.com/path_(v2))` parsed with naive pattern.
Failure: Extractor truncates URL and reports false broken links.
Fix: Use parser aware of markdown token boundaries or robust balancing logic.
Bad input: Extractor scans body blocks but skips bottom reference table.
Failure: Valid links are reported missing, creating audit noise.
Fix: Include document-wide reference resolution before validation.
Bad input: Only inline links reviewed; reference footnotes ignored.
Failure: Published docs contain hidden dead references.
Fix: Use extractor output as single source and validate both inline and reference links.
Bad input: Reference-style links are skipped during extraction.
Failure: The page looks fully checked, but hidden doc references still point to old URLs.
Fix: Include reference definitions in the review or run a second pass with a Markdown-aware checker.
Bad input: Image sources and action links are not distinguished.
Failure: The audit list becomes noisy and real navigation problems are harder to see.
Fix: Separate image assets, CTA links, and body links before assigning fixes.
Goal: Turn a Markdown draft into a link checklist for broken-link checks, redirect mapping, or internal-link review.
Result: You can spot bad anchors and wrong destinations before the page is published.
Goal: Extract all markdown links from release notes and docs to run fast broken-link checks.
Result: Doc release quality improves without manual link scanning.
Goal: Catch weak anchors and stale doc links while the change is still easy to edit.
Result: The final doc has fewer vague links and fewer last-minute broken-link fixes.
Goal: Make old-to-new URL mapping review less manual.
Result: Redirect gaps and wrong canonical targets are easier to spot before launch.
Slug and URL SEO Basics for Real Production Pages
Build cleaner URLs, avoid duplicate paths, and keep share links stable.
Content SEO Quick Audit Before You Publish
A lightweight checklist to catch technical and on-page SEO misses in minutes.
URL Parameter Encoding Playbook for Tracking and Redirect Safety
Prevent broken redirects and malformed UTM links with a consistent encode/decode workflow: separate path, query, and fragment responsibilities, encode parameter values exactly once, keep canonical URLs aligned, and validate tracking parameters end-to-end across email, ad, and in-app surfaces so attribution and callbacks stop silently failing.
Markdown Link Extractor is most reliable with real inputs and scenario-driven decisions, especially around "README, docs, or blog migration QA".
Markdown Link Extractor works best when you apply it with clear input assumptions and a repeatable workflow.
Process text in stable steps: normalize input, transform once, then verify output structure.
For large text blocks, use representative samples to avoid edge-case surprises in production.
Document your transformation rules so editors and developers follow the same standard.
When quality matters, combine automated transformation with a quick human review pass.
markdown
- [API guide](https://example.com/docs/api)
- [Migration notes](https://example.com/blog/migrate)Cause: A link can be technically reachable but still use vague anchor text or point to a non-canonical destination.
Fix: Review anchor text and URL together, then dedupe destinations before running the final link check.
Yes. Paste Markdown from a README, docs page, release note, or blog draft and it extracts the link text with the destination URL.
Yes. It separates Markdown anchor text from target URLs so you can review wording and destinations together.
Yes. It is useful for checking old-to-new doc links after CMS migration or URL restructuring.
You can spot repeated destinations, vague anchors, and links that should point to canonical URLs.
Yes. You can generate a unique URL list to speed up broken-link checks and redirect mapping.
No. Parsing and extraction happen entirely in your browser.
Keep browsing